LEY NO 27037 PDF

Como requisito básico para el acogimiento a los beneficios tributarios establecidos de conformidad con la ley N ,las empresas deben. Clause 21 21st. , Ley General de Industrias, which meet the requirements established in the 11th paragraph of Article of this Law, to benefit. , Ley General de lndustrias, which meet the requirements established in the 11th paragraph of Article of this Law, Section Third.

Author: Vujinn Akigor
Country: United Arab Emirates
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 28 June 2004
Pages: 422
PDF File Size: 20.70 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.2 Mb
ISBN: 449-5-69350-636-8
Downloads: 64024
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nektilar

Besides, why did not Republic Act which was approved on the same day as Republic Actmention preliminary investigation by Circuit Criminal Courts, just as the other later leey, Republic Actcited in the main opinion expressly treated and referred to said courts separately from the Courts of First Instance and Domestic Relations Courts, if really Pey intended to confer the power in issue on them?

The Constitution does not distinguish between warrants in key criminal case and administrative warrants in administrative proceedings. Such being the admitted 270377, the power to conduct preliminary examination must necessarily attach to the duties of a Circuit Criminal Court Judge; for aside from being one of the instruments by which a case may be accelerated and disposed of, it is a duty which truly lies within the scope of the office, essential to the accomplishment of the main purpose for which the office was created Sec.

It is clear that both the Manila Court of First Instance and municipal court can conduct a preliminary hearing or examination. Abbas, March 28,98 Phil. If the main purpose then in creating them are to alleviate pey burden of the regular Courts of First Instance and to accelerate the disposition of the cases therein as well as stem the tide of criminality, it is only logical that such authority vested in the judges of the regular courts is likewise conferred on Circuit Criminal Courts.

After the ratification of the Constitution on January 17,the source of the authority of the judge to conduct preliminary examination for purposes of issuing a warrant of arrest, is still the Constitution, this time the Constitution, which likewise guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons. I am gratified therefore that it is made explicit therein that our ruling is limited to the power of a judge under the Circuit Criminal Court Act 4 to conduct a preliminary examination.

It is enough, as was true before the executive order of President Quirino, that a bond be required to insure the appearance of the alien during the investigation, as was authorized in key executive order of President Roxas. It has not considered the second stage, that of preliminary investigation proper, one of equal significance.

In other words, Section 1 of Republic Act does not grant the circuit criminal courts jurisdiction “in” or “over” the cases listed, but, as may be plainly seen in the above-quoted tenor of its pertinent provision, only “the limited jurisdiction. The records of the case, moreover, reveal that a report seizure p.

On the same day, a hearing was conducted by the respondent Judge on the urgent motion for preliminary investigation and immediately thereafter, he denied said opposition of herein petitioner Annex “H”, p. Frankly, will never be able to comprehend why the majority can give the above provision a construction contrary to what plainly appears to be policy that underlies it, only for them to just the same “enjoin” all Circuit Criminal Courts “as a matter of policy”, of the Court that they should not conduct preliminary investigations, which I say the statute, as a matter of policy, never intended to allow them to do anyway.


The idea in the Francisco amendment was not new in the Philippines; for it was provided for in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Philippines.

It is patent that respondent Judge knew actually of the existence at least of the report of seizure of June 30,which is six days prior to his order of dismissal dated July 6, Military Governor in the exercise of his legislative powers as commander-in-chief of the occupation army and took effect on April 13, As heretofore intimated, the present practice or rule of court authorizing the judge to issue warrants of arrest based on the preliminary investigation conducted by the city fiscal, seems to violate the Constitution, which requires the judge himself to conduct the preliminary examination.

Counsel for petitioners then asked for time to raise the issue before this Court, which respondent Judge granted by giving petitioners a period of just one 1 day to seek relief from this Tribunal. As heretofore stated, Sections 13 and 14 of General Order No. Otherwise, the Courts of First Instance would still be carrying the burden of conducting preliminary investigations in those cases where Circuit Criminal Courts have jurisdiction and consequently delaying the trial and disposition of criminal cases pending before such Courts of First Instance.

The failure to add a specific repealing clause indicates that the intent was not to repeal any existing law Crawford, Construction of Statute, ed.

L is dismissed and the order of respondent Judge dated July 6, in G. Worse, the order nullified the power of seizure of the customs official. The term “magistrate” comprehended the Court of First Instance Temporosa v. The less an occupant of the bench fritter away his time and energy in tasks that could be left to other handsthe less the danger of his being a participant in any event that might lend itself to the interpretation that his impartiality has been compromised.

Tamparong, supra; Navarro, Criminal Procedure, ed.

The Constitution vests such power in the respondent judge who, however, may rely on the facts stated in the information filed after preliminary investigation by the prosecuting attorney” Amarga v. Court of Tax Appeals, Et Al.

Santos, is hereby ordered to conduct the preliminary investigation of the above-entitled case within five 5 days from receipt hereof and to file the necessary information in a court of competent jurisdiction if the evidence so warrants.

Ley Nº – Modifica la Ley Nº , Ley de promoción de la inversión en la Amazonía.

While the power to conduct preliminary examination may be delegated by law to government prosecutors, only the judge can issue the warrant of arrest under the Constitution and prior thereto Sayo, Et. But on the point now in controversy, I find it difficult to see his point. Rather, it is a clause which predicates the intended repeal upon the condition that a substantial and an irreconcilable conflict must be found in existing and 2703 Acts.

Said Albano case does not negate, but recognizes the authority judge of the Court of First Instance to conduct such preliminary nno.

Ley Nº 27759 – Modifica la Ley Nº 27037, Ley de promoción de la inversión en la Amazonía.

The jurisdiction herein conferred may be exercised by the Court of First Instance in 27073 province into which the ship ni watercraft upon which the crime or offense was committed shall come after the commission thereof: Apparently, when Rule was revised in the Rules, it was overlooked that under Section 99 of the Judiciary Act, “all laws and rules inconsistent with the provisions of this Act” was repealed thereby wiping away Section 37 of Act Now, is there anything in the conduct of preliminary investigations that makes it more inherent or inseparable from the expressed power “to try and decide” that necessarily, We must consider the same as included in said power or as something that must indispensably be added thereto, such that the authority therefor need not be spelled out in black and white?


Petitioners argue that said courts, having been conferred limited jurisdiction, cannot exercise 277037 power of preliminary investigation, the same not being embraced and contemplated within its given function to “try and decide” specific criminal cases.

But the Constitution empowers the National to grant the power to issue search warrants or warrants of arrest after conducting the necessary leey examination to “other responsible officer.

It was the prevailing 27307 among many delegates that some courts had been rather easy in the issuance of orders of arrest or search warrants, and quite strict in the matter of bail in cases where persons had been charged with capital offenses” Cuaderno, nk Framing of the Philippine Constitution, p.

The silence of the pertinent provisions of the Judiciary Act on the matter, taken together with the fact that Section 99 of the same Act repeals all laws and rules inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, indicates an unmistakable legislative intention to remove from the Court of First Instance the prerogative under discussion. In the cases at bar, it is admitted in the main opinion that because “the primary purpose of 2707 creation of the Circuit Criminal Courts in addition to the existing Courts of First Instance, as above intimated, is to expedite the disposition of criminal cases involving serious offenses specified in Section 1 of Republic Act.

Its authority to conduct preliminary examination and investigation granted under Section 6 of Republic Act No. They can only take cognizance of cases expressly specified in Section 1 of Republic Act No. Re-filing of the same is allowed if evidence has become sufficient to warrant conviction of private Respondent. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall not be violated, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined by the judge, or such other responsible officer as may be authorized by law, after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In fact, an arrest may even be made without a warrant, and it is only when a warrant is needed that the judge who is to issue the same is constitutionally bound to adhere to the conditions therein laid down. Ag FA – No.

Ley Nº 27406 – Modifica la Ley Nº 27037, Ley de promoción de la inversión en la Amazonía.

III, Constitution; Sec. Even when oey fiscal or prosecutor conducts the preliminary investigation, only the judge can validly issue the warrant of arrest. On June 20,Republic Act No.

Of course, it also contained provisions about preliminary investigations, but these did not in any manner indicate whether expressly or impliedly that the same courts would have authority to conduct such investigations. Santos is hereby ordered to file the necessary information for the crime of Estafa against respondent Pacita Nieva, in a court of competent jurisdiction, within forty-eight 48 hours from receipt hereof. I am not aware that any Court of First Instance has ever done so.